Tuesday, June 10, 2025



The Open Shuhada Street Campaign

Yesterday, February 25, the Wesleyan student participants in the Open Shuhada Street Campaign set up a blockade on the main stairs of Usdan to mark the 16th anniversary of the shutting down of Shuhada Street to Palestinians in the West Bank city of Hebron. We wish to thank all those who participated in the demonstration by taking alternative routes to the Usdan dining area. Shutting down one of the main thoroughfares of our campus was meant to symbolize the situation in Hebron today. Shuhada Street used to be the principal street for Palestinians in Hebron, home to residents, businesses and a very active marketplace. Today, because the street runs through Hebron’s Jewish settlement, Shuhada Street is closed to Palestinian movement and is a ghost town which only Israelis and tourists are allowed to access. People have sprayed hate graffiti across the closed Palestinian shops and those Palestinians still living on the street have to enter and exit their houses by climbing over neighbors’ roofs.

We have chosen to participate in this international event because we believe that direct action is an important form of education. By experiencing limits to our mobility for a couple of hours, we hope to generate more empathy for the Palestinians in Hebron for whom this situation is an everyday reality. We also are proud to stand in solidarity with people all over the world today who are participating in this action in the name of justice for all peoples of Israel/Palestine and the entire world. We encourage everyone to consider signing the Open Shuhada Street Campaign petition to the Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, asking Shuhada Street to be re-opened to Palestinian movement and commerce. The petition can be found online at “http://www.petitiononline.com/shuhada/petition.html.”

The students of the Open Shuhada Street campaign wish to bring Wesleyan’s attention to the situation in Hebron to illustrate the ongoing violations of international law and human rights abuses that prevent a peaceful existence in Hebron for Palestinians and Israelis. Because of Hebron’s importance as a holy city for Muslims and Jews, Hebron will play a crucial role in any future peace negotiations between Israel and Palestine and we do not believe the status quo will, or should be accepted for the rights and livelihood of Palestinians or Israelis. Hebron is also representative of larger injustices suffered by Palestinians in the West Bank including Israeli settlements, policies of institutionalized separation across the entire West bank, the lack of freedom of movement of Palestinians, random arrests and detentions of Palestinians, and the occupation at large.

In doing this action, we hoped to spark continued dialogue around Israel/Palestine at Wesleyan. We see this demonstration fitting into a larger campus conversation in which we encourage students of all backgrounds, opinions, and voices to participate. The Open Shuhada Street was one of several events and discussions related to Israel/Palestine that occurred at Wesleyan this week. If you were unable to participate, or unaware of the dialogue that is stirring at Wesleyan, tune in, and don’t miss the next opportunity to learn and speak your voice about the situation in Palestine/Israel. Now is the time to create positive change in the Middle East, and we all have a role to play. Peace and justice cannot wait-engage your voice today.

Signed,

The Student Participants in the Open Shuhada Street Campaign

Comments

7 responses to “The Open Shuhada Street Campaign”

  1. Oppressed Peoples Avatar
    Oppressed Peoples

    I salute your efforts to encourage empathy for an oppressed people. But why the Palestinians? Why not the the Abhazians, Basques, Chechens, Chins, Dagestanians, Tibetans, Hawains, Kurds, Ughars, or any of the other countless oppressed peoples in the world? Sure the Palestinians deserve a state, and encouraging solidarity has its place, but why are there no efforts on Wesleyan’s campus to voices solidarity with other groups that are fighting for justice against countries that have exercised a lot less restrainst than Israel?

  2. Alfred M. Lilienthal Avatar
    Alfred M. Lilienthal

    Longest military occupation in modern history, 20th-21st century genocidal settler colonialism, ethnic cleansing, and full blown apartheid since 1948; I wouldn’t call that restraint. Neo-colonial ethnocratic apartheid states, such as Israel, masquerading as a “democracy” is a sick farce and completely unacceptable.

  3. Oppressed Peoples Avatar
    Oppressed Peoples

    No country in the history of the worl has ever exercised more restraint than Israel. Nor has any country that has not lost a war ever agreed to give up land in a diplomatic process.

    A)Israel’s occupation has gone on since 1967. This is a much shorter time, than China’s occupation of Tibet. The United States’ occupation of Hawaii, Russia’s occpation of Chechnya, Turkey’s occupation of Kurdistan, Sudan’s occupation of Darfur. There are countless other examples of occupations that have continued for mch longer. Are these not a sick farce? Why criticize Israel and not these other occuppiers.
    B)Equating Jewish nationalism (Zionism) to aprathaid, and deligitimizing it as a rascist movement, is rascist in and of itself!! What you are essentially saying is that every group of people can have a contry, but if the Jews choose to exercise the same right its rascist and illegitimate.
    C) Any resolution of this conflict begins with the full realization that both Palestinians and Israelis trace their identities to the same piece of land, and both have legitimate claims. Sure Israel defining itself as a Jewish state creates a situation in which the majority (Jews) have certain rights that the minority (Arabs) do not have, but Israel does take efforts to ensure the rights of minorities. Ofcourse you can make the claim that Israel does not do enough, but then you must also criticize other countires that have done less.
    Israel should be judged by the same standards as every other country. How are Israel’s actions more offensive than those of Sudan, Russia, Sri Lanka?

  4. Stacie Szmonko '07 Avatar
    Stacie Szmonko ’07

    Jewish Anti-Zionist Organizers
    (if you identify as the above, please come out to this conference this summer in detroit: http://www.jewsconfrontapartheid.org)–

  5. Anti-Zionism=Racism!!! Avatar
    Anti-Zionism=Racism!!!

    Its down right shameful for Jews to organize or participate in such a conference!! Jewish identity is composed of many different aspects, and each person decides which of these they identify with. If someone chooses to not identify with the nationalist aspect of Judaism than they have that right, but they do not have the right to deny another person to identify as they choose.

    We live in a world of nation states and national movements. Nationalism is a flwaed idea, but humans have chosen to organize themselves into nation states. The Jewish people constitute a nation just like any other, so why is Jewish nationalism illegitmate, while every other nationalist movement is not. There are many ethnocratic and theocratic countires in the world that actively suppress the rights of minorities. Israel at least makes an effort to defend the rights of its minorities in a difficult security situation. You should hate the game and not the player.

  6. so... Avatar
    so…

    Jews should buy into this nationalism because to do otherwise would be self-hate? That is to say, there is only one legitimate Jewish identity, and you embody it? Take your cro-magnon ideas elsewhere. Israel is a state subject to international law, not a “player” in any game. The transgressions of its government are not cute. These protesters ask only that Israel pay the same heed to its many Arab citizens as it does to foreign Jews (who receive automatic citizenship upon request while indigenous Arabs live in limbo as internally displaced persons). For people with your views, the facts are racist.

  7. Anti-Zionism=Racism!!! Avatar
    Anti-Zionism=Racism!!!

    Every body is free to identify in any way they choose. If someone chooses not to identify with the nationalist aspect of Judaism then they are free to do so, but they have not right limit another person’s identity. The Jews are a nation just like any other.

    Ofcourse, Israel should be criticized for breaking international laws, but so should every other nation. So why is Israel the only country that is hated so vehemently on college campuses? There are many countires that define citizenship along ethnic or religous lines, why do you not criticize them? The international community and individuals can play an important role in applying pressure through relevant criticism, but the current dynamic of leveling one sided, biased, and hypocritical attacks at Israel, while giving other offenders a free pass, does more harm than good.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Wesleyan Argus

Since 1868: The United States’ Oldest Twice-Weekly College Paper

© The Wesleyan Argus