Monday, June 23, 2025



“Are You Wesleyan?” Apparently Not If You’re Fat

The fairly new admissions website asks the question “Are You Wesleyan?” It shows a representation of Wesleyan’s student body (carefully selected, I assume) doing various intellectual tasks, from dancing about neurobiology to discussing Homer in the library. According to the site, being able to “contemplate infinity” and “find patterns in complexity” are important qualities for students here. I would add one other thing: not being fat. I searched through Wesleyan’s website for about half an hour and was unable to find a single picture of an overweight person.

However, it is hard to place blame on whoever selected the photos for this website as it is equally as hard to find an overweight person while walking around Wesleyan’s campus. Wesleyan constantly stresses the diversity of our student body. Wesleyan’s “At a Glance” pamphlet boasts 27% students of color and our Freeman East Asian Studies program. What I am trying to understand is why my friends could only name an average of three overweight students they knew on campus, when according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 67% of American adults are overweight.

I don’t think that the small number of overweight students at Wesleyan is necessarily due to discriminatory admissions policies. I think that students here legitimize or validate their negative beliefs against overweight or obese individuals instead of acknowledging that their beliefs are prejudiced. While many forms of prejudice in liberal institutions like Wesleyan are subconscious, fat prejudice is still overtly displayed. From childish name calling to proclamations of disgust, I see instances of intolerance of obese people on a daily basis. So why then, if we are one of the most progressive liberal arts schools in New England with the reputation for social justice and civil liberties, is it still common practice to discriminate against overweight or obese people?

It is difficult for people to understand why an obese person wouldn’t change something about their life so that they could lose weight. Comments like “why don’t they just go to the gym” or “just don’t eat as much” are good examples. People are quick to jump to conclusions that fat people must be fat because they are lazy or do not care enough about themselves to make a change in their lifestyle. However, coming from a family where obesity is an issue, I know that many obese people would love to be skinny and have been trying their entire lives to be that way. It is easy for someone who has never struggled with weight to say that an overweight person should just “go to the gym.” But looking at the kind of exercise-crazy college students that go to our gym, I cannot imagine the kind of anxiety an overweight person must feel just stepping foot inside.

It is easy to hold prejudice towards a group of people that is characterized as having a lot of internalized self-hatred. From NBC’s The Biggest Loser to Oprah’s weight-loss specials, we see images and hear stories of overweight people who hate themselves and want to change. When I spoke to one of the few obese people that I know on campus, he told me that he would definitely prefer to be skinny. “If people focused on helping people be who they want to be as opposed to pitying or discriminating against people who are different, I think I would be in a much better position.  I don’t need your pity, I need you to not judge me when I’m on the treadmill,” he says.

Clearly, obesity is a problem in the United States. However, holding prejudice for obese or overweight people is not a solution to the problem and we, as Wesleyan students, should know better than that. We should focus on supporting overweight people reach their goals, whatever they might be, rather than discriminating against them for looking different.

Comments

40 responses to ““Are You Wesleyan?” Apparently Not If You’re Fat”

  1. Anon Avatar
    Anon

    You poor dear, did the bad bad chocolate cake force you to eat it again? We will have to pass a civil rights law against that!

    Shut up, porker.

  2. Anon '10 Avatar
    Anon ’10

    What makes it so much harder for overweight people at Wesleyan is that they are definitely in the minority, and yes, most students here don’t understand their situation. I am very glad that the author brought up this issue.
    Wesleyan may actually be a tougher environment for overweight people than many other liberal arts colleges because our standard of “thinness” is that much higher. I’ve visited other schools and was shocked to find myself looking at perfectly normally shaped people and judging them to be chubby. I had to take a step back and realize that I’ve been so influenced by what is considered “normal” here that my image of a thin body has been vastly distorted.
    We should be striving to create an environment more open to and supportive of different body types.

  3. '11 Avatar
    ’11

    Part of it is the massive amount of misinformation being spread around the American fitness industry. In reality, to lose weight all it takes is a decent lifting program (i.e. no curls or crunches!), eating less then your maintenance calorie intake level, and a long-term commitment. It really isn’t that big of a deal.

    -Former fattie

  4. todd Avatar
    todd

    @ #1: why did you automatically assume that the author is overweight? he isn’t.

  5. 1 Avatar
    1

    Well why the hell should you care If he’s overweight? I thought there was nothing wrong with that and it’s all big bad society’s fault? And when is it his business to bitch on behalf of the porkers if he isn’t one himself?

  6. Anon '09 Avatar
    Anon ’09

    I never used to go to the gym at Wes because I felt super-self-conscious whenever I was there. Now, having graduated, I actually pay for a gym because it’s so much chiller and less stressful to me than the Wesleyan gym.

  7. todd Avatar
    todd

    i don’t care if he’s overweight. in fact, you’re the one who does. i have a problem with you assuming that it’s no body’s business but overweight people’s to tackle the stigma that they’re subjected to–this sentiment was obvious in your first comment, and you reaffirmed it in your second. the stigma a collective issue that is very much perpetrated by people who are not overweight, and who thus have a responsibility to address it. the author is doing his part, and thus i commend him for it.

  8. ... Avatar

    cool that you and your friends sit around and count the number of fat people

  9.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    I have a problem with complaining about prejudice against obese people when we already have problems with prejudice against people for things that cannot be changed, like race or gender, or (for the time being, as we don’t work yet) socioeconomic status.

    Why are you making it seem like a bad thing that we have a relatively fit campus? Why are you not calling it healthy instead of “exercise-crazy”? I agree that our culture is too weight obsessed and that a lot of people’s idea of a healthy weight is too skinny. But I don’t see the problem with having less obsese people that usual on campus. I just don’t really understand why this is an issue for you.

  10. 1 again Avatar
    1 again

    @todd
    Dude I wasn’t gonna take it this seriously, but you’re so full of crap I just have to respond.

    I don’t think it’s fat peoples’ business to “tackle” the stigma. You’re just assuming that the stigma’s a bad thing, when we all know that fat people have lower life-expectancy and numerous other problems. It totally makes sense to have a stigma against unhealthy life choices, and my point is it’s their own fault that they’re unhealthy, so instead of getting oversensitive idiots like you to defend them, they should just start eating celery sticks instead of pudding and suck it up.

    Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know we’re supposed to think that discrimination is “evil” and all that crap, but I challenge you or any other friend of the fatties to give me one good reason why we shouldn’t have a stigma against them. And don’t throw crap at me about how we don’t have a stigma against overly thin people or some shit. Just because we don’t have a stigma against one unhealthy life choice, it doesn’t mean we should have none. Now argue with me like a thinking human being if you can, or stop whining.

  11. todd Avatar
    todd

    i’m for making good, healthy choices. but the problem is that you’re assuming that all people are obese because of choices they have made. this is a gross oversimplification of the issue. that’s like saying that poor people are poor because they’re lazy. in reality, many factors play into whether someone is obese, including genetic, socio-economic and psychological ones, among others.

    my argument against stigmization is that it’s not constructive. all that it does is make people feel bad about themselves and cause undue social tension. overweight people have been stigmatized for a long time, but do you see this stigma mitigating the obesity problem? And this is not touching on the moral aspect of it–do you seriously consider it to be okay to look down upon a whole group of people just because of the way they look? I mean, really?

  12. 1 Avatar
    1

    Hate to break it to you buddy, but the shit you’re saying is hurting fatties a lot more than anything I could argue. Do you have any idea how fuvking condescending it is to tell people they’re NOT defective by choice? That takes away any hope they have of fixing themselves bcuz if they didn’t choose to be fat there’s no way they can choose to be thin.

    The fact that some people ignore a stigma and still act like morons is no reason to assume it’s ineffective. If we followed your soft, “don’t be
    mean” approach, I bet you anything there’d be more porkers than there are now bcuz the only damn way anyone will avoid making convenient but unhealthy choices is if they’re afraid of what people will say about them/do to them if they don’t.

    And do I think it’s cool to look down on someone if they’re ugly/fat? Hell yeah.

  13. todd Avatar
    todd

    I’m not sure how not deluding someone into doing something they can’t do is hurting them. Again, you’re using the premise that overcoming obesity is a simple question of a personal choice as the basis for your arguments. And I’ll tell you again, the issue is not this simple. There are many factors, mostly external, that determine whether someone is obese, and these preclude the individual’s options for adopting lifestyles that change the way they look. This is one point.

    The second point is regarding the effectiveness of stigmatization. Of course people would be driven by this stigma to make changes in their lifestyles in order overcome their overweight problem. For a certain fraction of them, these actions would be effective, but for the rest, it might not be. This, however, is not an argument for the effectiveness of stigmatization because it doesn’t resolve the fundamental causes for obesity (socio-economical, psychological, etc.). A real measure of the effectiveness of any approach to tackle a problem is the extent to which the problem is mitigated. And again, there is no sign of the obesity problem significantly dwindling in the presence of this stigma. The assertion that there would be more obese people if the stigma were to be removed is merely hypothetical and simplistic, and does not prove anything. What this stigma does, instead, is lead people to make decisions that are based on fear of what others might think, but not ones that are motivated by any objective conviction of the validity or value of these these decisions per se. This is not a sign of a healthy society.

    Thirdly, I really don’t understand what gives you the sense of entitlement to judge how people lead their lives. This sense of superiority is appalling and extremely arrogant. It’s completely out of place. One can give advice to someone on taking a particular course of action, but essentially forcing them (by stigmatizing them, for instance) is not appropriate.

    Finally and more fundamentally, I find that your moral outlook is questionable. I’m not sure how you want me to respond when you say that it’s okay to look down on people because of the way they look. You clearly believe that there’s nothing wrong with discrimination, thus defying a very basic universal truism. Looking down upon someone is deeming that person inferior, and this is problematic enough, but doing so because of something that is beyond their control (like the way they look) is simply immoral.

  14. 1, 1, 1 Avatar
    1, 1, 1

    HAHAHAHAHAHA oh…oh man. Dude, unless you’re a fattie yourself, calm the fuck down. I’m gonna tackle everything you said, but seriously, I thought you were going to go Godwin’s Law or something on me there.

    Where the hell do you get this idea that being fat is beyond peoples’ choices? I mean, yeah, I haven’t said anything in support of my assumption either, but you just keep claiming there are these evil external factors. What, did you get that from your sociology class or something? Give me some kind of hard evidence or stfu, because I think I’ve got a better assumption for people to start with at the social level. You didn’t make a point. You made a bunch of assertions and made them hold hands. Cut the crap.

    Summary of your second point: It only works for some people, and if it doesn’t work for everyone, it’s not effective. This is obviously bullshit, and also conjecture, like you claim I’m making. I really love this line, though: “What this stigma does, instead, is lead people to make decisions that are based on fear of what others might think, but not ones that are motivated by any objective conviction of the validity or value of these these decisions per se. This is not a sign of a healthy society.” I guess every society ever is unhealthy, then. What a load of techie crap.

    And kiss my ass – not everyone is equal, and it’s time someone said it. Some people are dumb and weak and pathetic. We force people not to murder each other, and we stigmatize prostitution, both of which deserve it, IMO, because one is unarguably wrong, and the other is just a horrible way to live, and ask anyone who’s lived that way.

    I don’t give a fuck what you think about my moral outlook. You’re a self-important ass, and “discrimination is bad” isn’t a universal truism except among hippies like you. We discriminate for tons of reasons at this damn school on a daily basis, and you’re committing an act of discrimination just by favoring one moral viewpoint (yours) over another (mine). People ARE inferior to each other in objective ways (like intelligence and physical strength), and being fat is inferior to being fit because you’re more likely to die. Go whine to Darwin if you don’t like it.

  15. todd Avatar
    todd

    There’s enough evidence that some people are genetically predisposed to gain more weight than others. There are also many physical and psychological disorders that lead to unhealthy eating. Included in the mix are social factors that lead people to unhealthy behaviors. Look them up. These are factors that varyingly undermine the individual’s ability to make “choices” with regards to their eating habits. In many cases, such as when someone has a physical disorder that causes them to be overweight, the individual’s choices are extremely limited. Incidentally, what is described as choice is a very subjective matter; saying the issue is a simple matter of having a choice or not having a choice (which I didn’t say by the way; I said the issue is more complex than that) does not give the issue justice. It simply is too simplistic. For the sake of being fair (given that one cares about being so; for me, it’s an extremely important factor), one can’t go on berating people for not making certain choices when the issue at hand is more complex than the question of making choices.

    One thing we know for sure is that stigmatization does not resolve the problem of obesity because the problem still exists. This is not a conjecture, and does not require any complex analysis. Whether it works for some people as the driving force to eliminate their overweight problem may or may not be true, but a logical conclusion would be that it does have an effect on some people, whether positive or negative. What is not a logical conclusion, however, is that it’s effective, because this conclusion is simplistic and doesn’t rely on evidence. This is a summary of my second point.

    My statement about the sign of a healthy society was a rhetorical one. My point was that it’s not healthy for people to base their decisions on fear rather than logic, and that it’s not healthy for a society to have this sentiment prevalent. This doesn’t mean that this society as a whole is unhealthy, but that there’s a failure in that domain. I’m not sure about you, but I support practices that allow people to make decisions rationally and that improves interactions about members of society.

    You argue that people don’t commit murder because they are forced not to. First of all, I don’t see how this stigma even compares to the stigma against overweight people. Second of all, you have a grim outlook on the world. I would like to believe that people don’t kill each other because they are convinced that it’s morally wrong to do so. Third of all, what’s the basis for your assumption that stigmatization is what keeps prostitution and murder rates in check? Did you consider personal beliefs, education, social equality, law etc. as potential factors?

    Yes, there are differences among people and it’s only silly to deny that. And yes, not everyone is equal. But it’s important to distinguish between social inequality, and the types of inequalities that you outlined. However, the fact people are not equal physically or psychological does not justify the existence of social inequality. The fact that people are less intelligent or less fit does mean that we have to act on these differences, and does not warrant looking down on them. The moment we dwell on this superficial inferiority, we give room for the dehumanization of others. Isn’t this what gives rise to racism? (I’ll refrain from going into what Godwin’s Law describes).

    It seems like you’re using the general definition of discrimination as the framework for your arguments. Obviously I’m not talking about recognizing differences among people or objects. The kind of discrimination I’m talking about pertains to the unjust treatment of people due to categorical differences in race, age, gender, sexual orientation or appearance. The fact that discrimination exists, whether at Wesleyan or elsewhere, doesn’t justify its existence. By the way, the act of favoring one viewpoints over another is discrimination in so far as recognizing that the viewpoints are different, and this is completely besides the point.

  16. 1, 1, 1 Avatar
    1, 1, 1

    Alright! Now this shit is getting interesting. Man, I didn’t know I’d get to have an actual argument on the basis of some dumb comment:

    “There’s enough evidence that some people are genetically predisposed to gain more weight than others. There are also many physical and psychological disorders that lead to unhealthy eating. Included in the mix are social factors that lead people to unhealthy behaviors. Look them up. These are factors that varyingly undermine the individual’s ability to make ‘choices’ with regards to their eating habits.”

    Okay. I’ll buy the disorders thing, but do those disorders just make it harder to stay thin, or impossible? At some point, the person has to make a choice to pick up the chocolate cake or the sprouts. Do some people gain the same amount of weight if they eat sprouts as if they eat chocolate cake? Even if they do, I don’t think that means the stigma’s bad in general. Pretty much any social standard’s a generalization, and at least the “no fatties” one is connected to evolution, unlike, say, racism.

    “One thing we know for sure is that stigmatization does not resolve the problem of obesity because the problem still exists. This is not a conjecture, and does not require any complex analysis. Whether it works for some people as the driving force to eliminate their overweight problem may or may not be true, but a logical conclusion would be that it does have an effect on some people, whether positive or negative. What is not a logical conclusion, however, is that it’s effective, because this conclusion is simplistic and doesn’t rely on evidence. This is a summary of my second point.”

    Okay, but buddy, that’s not gonna help your case. What you’re saying is “we don’t know that it’s effective.” That’s not an argument for it not existing. It could be that the stigma alone isn’t enough to completely cure obesity, but it does deter some people. And pay attention here – I said “it COULD be.” I don’t know any better than you do how effective it is bcuz I can’t measure it. What I DO know is that you’re the one arguing for change, so you have to prove it’s bad, not just that it could be bad. A lot of stuff we take for granted could be bad, but that doesn’t mean we just junk it.

    “My point was that it’s not healthy for people to base their decisions on fear rather than logic, and that it’s not healthy for a society to have this sentiment prevalent.”

    Uhhhh, dude? People are stupid. Not everyone can make decisions based on logic, because not everyone’s capable of it. Also, fear can be pretty damn logical (like, say, fear of lions), so I don’t think it’s right to set them up as opposites.

    “You argue that people don’t commit murder because they are forced not to. First of all, I don’t see how this stigma even compares to the stigma against overweight people.”

    It doesn’t. I’m just pointing out that not all stigmas are bad.

    “Second of all, you have a grim outlook on the world. I would like to believe that people don’t kill each other because they are convinced that it’s morally wrong to do so.”

    Yeah, but where do they get that idea of morality? From social stigmas. I mean, come on, humans are just like any other animal, and we kill each other all the time when social constructs say it’s valid. Oh, and quit defending murder laws. MURDERS STILL HAPPEN EVEN THO WE HAVE MURDER LAWS THEREFORE WE CAN’T KNOW IF THEY’RE EFFECTIVE, WHICH MEANS THEY’RE UNJUST LOL.

    ” Third of all, what’s the basis for your assumption that stigmatization is what keeps prostitution and murder rates in check? Did you consider personal beliefs, education, social equality, law etc. as potential factors?”

    Yeah, duh, those are potential factors. I just don’t think they’re as influential. I mean, come on, people with set religious beliefs about how murder is wrong still kill each other. Ted Kaczynski went to Harvard (he was highly educated), and he still built bombs. Upper-class and lower-class people kill each other. And as for law…dude, THAT’S A STIGMA. And it’s based on social morals.

    “However, the fact people are not equal physically or psychological does not justify the existence of social inequality.”

    Yes it does. Society has the right to decide that certain people are more productive than others.

    “The fact that people are less intelligent or less fit does mean that we have to act on these differences, and does not warrant looking down on them.”

    Bullshit.

    “The moment we dwell on this superficial inferiority, we give room for the dehumanization of others. Isn’t this what gives rise to racism?”

    No. What gives rise to racism is thinking that groups have immutable characteristics. I’m talking about looking down on individuals. And boo hoo, dehumanization. Some people deserve it. Like criminals, for instance.

    Why the hell are you lumping appearance in with race, age, gender and sexual orientation? Those four things can’t be changed. You can change your appearance. Totally different. And no, that last sentence is completely wrong. Favoring one viewpoint over another both recognizes that the two are different, and that one is preferable, otherwise we wouldn’t call it “favoring.” Semantics FAIL.

    This is fun!

  17. todd Avatar
    todd

    From a practical standpoint, the stigma might deter people from eating more. However it’s not a solution to it because it doesn’t solve the underlying causes of obesity besides making people make choices that follow from of a certain fear from being looked down upon (which I will comment on shortly). From a moral standpoint, stigmatizing people because of the way they look, regardless of whether they’ve chosen to look that way, is wrong. As far as any one is concerned, their being overweight doesn’t hurt anyone; even if they’ve chosen to be obese, why should we even care? On top of that, you have to be considerate of the people who have medical conditions that cause them to be obese: how would you make the distinction between them and the others? Above all, judging someone based on their physical appearance, which you take as the overriding factor in determining the value as people, is not appropriate. The moral implication, in my belief, trumps any argument for the effectiveness of the practice.

    Fear is a useful response only in so far as someone is in immediate danger. Evolutionarily speaking, fear elicits a quicker response when we are, say, running from a lion. When it comes to more complex behaviors, we have developed a complex brain to help us assess situations on a higher level than simple emotional responses allow us to. This is what separates us from animals. If people judge situations solely on the basis of fear or similar emotions, people would become impulsive. In this sense, fear is not logical.

    You’re grossly undermining people’s intelligence. Yes, some people are less intelligent than others, but implying that most people are incapable of logical thinking is absurd. You’re suggesting that most people are stupid and should be kept on a leash by making them afraid. Maybe now you should suggest instating a totalitarian regime for the sake of consistency?

    Your assertion that stigmas give rise to the perception of morality is ridiculous. Do you even understand the concept of stigma? I suggest that you google it for a change. There are stigmas against mental illnesses, scars, medical histories, physical disabilities, among other things. So by your logic, these stigmas will lead to a moral consciousness that regard these traits as reprehensible?

    I’m not defending murder laws. I don’t claim them to be perfect, but they are certainly factors that determine the occurrence of murder. And no, laws are not stigmas. Again, I suggest that you familiarize yourself with the concept of stigma.

    Recognizing that people have immutable characteristics is perfectly normal. That’s just saying that people have certain characteristics that they are born with. So how does this lead to racism? Racism is the belief that members of a certain race are inherently either inferior or superior. To look down on someone is to regard them with a feeling of superiority. By looking down on overweight people, you’re lumping together a group of people with certain physical characteristics and regard them with a feeling of superiority. That stands on similar grounds with racism, and discrimination on the basis of age, gender and sexual orientation, no? Here the question of whether they chose to be overweight is relevant, because the end result is that you’re judging them based on their physical appearance, as if that’s the ultimate determinant of their character as a group, notwithstanding their values as individuals. And by the way, saying that it’s okay to dehumanize a criminal doesn’t mean that it’s okay to dehumanize an overweight person.

    My last comment was in reference to your use of the word “discrimination.” Read my sentence again. What I said was if you choose to describe favoring one viewpoint to another as discrimination, then this description is only valid in the sense that you recognize that viewpoints in question are different. It seems like you’re the one who demonstrates a failure in semantic competency.

    I wish you would maintain a certain level of civility.

  18. todd Avatar
    todd

    In the second-to-last sentence of the second-to-last paragraph, I meant to say “irrelevant.”

  19. 1 Avatar
    1

    Dude, there’s no way we can keep arguing. We’ve just got completely different ways of looking at this issue, and I honestly don’t think I could persuade you even if I beat up all your points one more time. Besides, I’ve got work to do.

  20. todd Avatar
    todd

    Yes, continuing this argument looks pointless.

  21. hai guys Avatar
    hai guys

    I gotta say, #1 is a total douche who uses a condescending tone and unnecessary personal attacks against todd, but for the most part I agree with his argument.

    Long live stigmas with social benefits!

  22. anon Avatar
    anon

    @hai guys: The phrase “stigmas with social benefits” is an oxymoron.

  23. Katie Avatar
    Katie

    #1: you’re an asshole. Discriminating against someone you don’t know (yes, even criminals) is immoral, ignorant, and just plain unproductive. There’s two sides to EVERY story. And if you don’t believe me, take psychology and the law. You’ll walk out with your tail between your legs. People are people, and just because you’re smart and thin doesn’t make you any better than someone who isn’t. Everyone’s good at something. So get over yourself

  24. 1 Avatar
    1

    Tell it to someone who cares, you goddamn idiot. Oh, and you don’t know me, so what makes you qualified to make the discriminatory statement that I’m an asshole? Yeah, that’s what I thought, hypocrite.

  25. anonymous '10 Avatar
    anonymous ’10

    #1: You’re just plainly stupid. Yeah, I don’t know you, but reading everything you wrote gives me more than enough information to arrive at this conclusion.

  26. anonymous '13 Avatar
    anonymous ’13

    I think todd deserves a shoutout for standing up to this pretentious jerk. and 1, please take a few minutes to consider the possibility that you could be wrong

  27. 1 Avatar
    1

    ‘Cause both of you totally considered that possibility when you wrote those comments, right? Hey, at least you’re actually being honest about judging me. Today, the “pretentious jerk,” tomorrow the porker…

  28. anonymous Avatar
    anonymous

    Dude, seriously, what’s with you and the word “porker?” You’re like a middle school kid who counters arguments by saying, ” you’re butt face!”

  29. 1 Avatar
    1

    I just like seeing how you guys respond to it. Butt face.

  30. anonymous Avatar
    anonymous

    Poop face.

  31. DON'T FEED THE TROLL Avatar
    DON’T FEED THE TROLL

    SERIOUSLY U GAIZ

  32. Abram Avatar
    Abram

    Is it bad that there are few overweight people on campus? No. The term “overweight” like the term “underweight” is used to describe a bmi which is unhealthy. What would be the benefit of having more people who are unhealthy? Like Devon said, the issue isn’t discriminatory admission policies, since I know of no way for the admissions office to find out how much I weigh.

    Are fat people inferior? Well, what measure are we using? Being overweight will usually make you athletically inferior, just like being very short, or too weak. But this does not justify a stigma against being fat, or short or, weak because none of these things have a causal relationship with intelligence, ingenuity, friendliness, or any number of other valuable traits.

    Being overweight is unhealthy. There is no argument against that, but being mean about it isn’t the way to help. If you have a friend who would like to be healthier in any way, support them, just like you’d support a friend who wanted to make any other positive change. Otherwise, it’s none of your business.

  33. who cares? Avatar
    who cares?

    To all the bitches who call overweight people porkers: fuck you. Not all overweight people are that way because of laziness. A lot of it has to do with genetics, you assholes. And I bet in ten years, you’ll be fat and ugly.
    To the people trying(key word here: trying) to be nice about it: shut the hell up. Honestly, they probably don’t want your pity.
    People are people, regardless of weight. Why can’t you idiots understand that? I’m probably way younger than all of you, and I even get this. *sighs* I hate people.

  34. John Avatar
    John

    I’ll bet fat people love to use that genetics excuse…

  35. Radcliffe Avatar
    Radcliffe

    I once dated a guy who tried to tell me he was really into smart girls, offering as evidence that his ex-girlfriend went to Wesleyan. I thought that was odd, but didn’t think too much about it until I dated a guy who himself went to Wesleyan. He informed me of this while smiling as if the sun were shining out of his ass.

    I went to Harvard. Why do Wesleyan people think they’re smart?? They are not as smart as the people I went to Harvard with. They are about as smart as my high school classmates who went to UMass Amherst, except the UMass people were down-to-earth and pleasant and the Wesleyan people were self-deluded, one-upping braggarts whomake themselves look ridiculous by trying to one-up those who clearly outdo them.

  36. Obviously you're not Wesleyan Avatar
    Obviously you’re not Wesleyan

    Wesleyan students do about seven things at once. You’ll find them in class, the library, the gym, of course, but in the same afternoon you might also find them working in one of 200 student organizations or tutoring in the local elementary school. Maybe they’re having coffee with friends in the Usdan Center. Or maybe they’re sitting up on Foss Hill using WiFi to send emails to Mom while watching the baseball game against Williams and thinking about tomorrow’s potluck and how great that screening with Joss Whedon was and whether their friends are going to that cool dance performance at the Center for the Arts. Choose for yourself—that’s what Wesleyan students do.

  37. Obviously you're not Wesleyan Avatar
    Obviously you’re not Wesleyan

    Hey I go to Uconn – I think i can do all 7 of these things at once.

    1] sitting on Foss Hill
    2] use Wifi to send emails to Mom
    3] watch the baseball game against Williams
    4] think about tomorrow’s Potluck
    5] ditto about how great the screening with Joss Whedon was
    6] thinking about whether their friends are going to that cool dance performance at the Cente for the Arts
    7] SMOKE A BIG FAT DOOBIE

  38. Like Harvard Did to Allston Avatar
    Like Harvard Did to Allston

    God, I love cougars.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Wesleyan Argus

Since 1868: The United States’ Oldest Twice-Weekly College Paper

© The Wesleyan Argus