c/o William Halliday, Photo Editor

c/o William Halliday, Photo Editor

According to a publicly available complaint filed on Aug. 4 in the Superior Court District of Middlesex, the University and former student and Residential Advisor Andrew Barer ’84 are defendants in a lawsuit that claims Barer sexually abused minors in University dormitories and basketball facilities between 1982 and 1984.

Courtroom action was scheduled to begin on Sept. 11. Of the seven allegations in the case, the University is being sued on two counts of negligence by the plaintiffs, Craig Salamone and Doug Cartelli, who were Middletown residents and middle-schoolers when the alleged conduct occurred.

“At all times relevant to this action, the defendant, Wesleyan University, knew or should have known that the defendant, Andrew Barer, sexually abused, sexually assaulted, and sexually exploited the minor plaintiff, Craig Salamone,” Count One of the complaint reads.

Barer is currently a Senior Coach at the company Precision Sales Coaching & Training, according to its website. Barer’s biography states that he graduated from the University with a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology and History, and twice received the University’s Limbach Prize, given annually to the student “who has contributed the most imaginative, generous, thoughtful, and understanding social service to the people of the City of Middletown and/or the Wesleyan community.”

Barer was also a member of the University’s basketball team, and the complaint alleges that he used the University’s basketball facilities as a location to sexually abuse children. Barer would lure minors with the promise of teaching them “plyometrics, stretching, and other physical activity in order to enhance their athletic ability.” In the winter of 1983, when Salamone was thirteen, the complaint states that Barer invited Salamone into his Wesleyan dorm room to develop his exercise and stretching techniques, but proceeded to sexually abuse him. Count One point 17 alleges that the abuse continued with other unnamed minors during this period. Cartelli details a nearly identical pattern of sexual assault that took place between 1982 and 1984, starting when the Plaintiff was 12. 

The President’s Office declined to comment on the matter, in line with the University’s policy not to opine on pending litigation, although University Manager of Media and Public Relations Lauren Rubenstein did speak on the threat of sexual violence more broadly in an email to The Argus.

“We take very seriously and condemn any sexual violence, especially involving minors,” Rubenstein wrote.

The complaint continues by arguing that the University employees breached their duties in five key respects and that Barer’s actions were “foreseeable” and could have been prevented if the University had met its obligations to monitor its resident advisors.

“…[The University] failed to properly monitor and supervise the defendant, Andrew Barer, in order to prevent injuries to minors such as the plaintiff, Craig Salamone,” Count One point 20 of the complaint reads. “…[T]hey allowed the defendant, Andrew Barer, to be alone with the plaintiff, Craig Salamone, inside the housing facilities owned by the defendant, Wesleyan University, without monitoring or supervising him in any way.”

While the more specific details of the case will only emerge as the litigation progresses, Salamone and Cartelli’s lawyers believe that University administrators and employees failed to scrutinize Barer’s past conduct or monitor his behavior while he attended Wesleyan.

“Administrators, professional staff, coaching staff, security officers and other employees knew, should have known or could have known that the defendant, Andrew Barer, had taken the minor plaintiff, Craig Salamone, into his dorm room located housing facilities on the Defendant, Wesleyan University’s campus,” the complaint reads.

Among other charges, the complaint argues that the University failed to investigate the matter or warn parents and guardians of children that Barer may have had contact with in his role as a University residential advisor and varsity basketball player.

“…[T]hey negligently hired the defendant, Andrew Barer, when a reasonable investigation or background check would have uncovered the danger that the defendant, Andrew Barer, posed to children including the plaintiff, Craig Salamone,” the complaint states.

The YMCA of Northern Middlesex County is another defendant in the suit, where Barer served as a camp counselor to Salamone on a Bike Tour of Martha’s Vineyard in the summer of 1984.

In Connecticut, the statute of limitations for the prosecution of the sexual abuse of minors is within 30 years of the date the victim turns 18, or within five years of the date the crime is reported to any police officer, according to Connecticut General Statute § 54-193a (2012)

This is not the first time Barer has faced legal action for accusations of misconduct involving children. An article from the New Canaan Advertiser reveals the details of Barer’s prior arrest in January 2014 and his dismissal as the Youth Program Director of the Outback Teen Center. 

He is charged with second-degree breach of peace, a misdemeanor, over inappropriate comments he allegedly made to a group of Saxe Middle School students on Wednesday, Jan. 15,” the article reads. “…The basis for breach of peace is that Barer told 10- and 11-year-old boys if they didn’t start attending the Outback Teen Center, he would “kick their a–es” and “cut off their d—-s,” the warrant states; the latter containing a lewd reference to the male reproductive organ.”

The article describes another incident where Barer supposedly asked for the phone numbers and email addresses of several fifth-grade boys. At the time, Barer denied the charges.

“Barer allegedly told students he knows people involved in the Discovery Channel reality show, ‘Alaska: The Last Frontier,’ and the warrant specifically mentions Otto Kilcher, a star of the show,” the article reads. “In several accounts of the events, Barer told students he could take them on a trip to Alaska, and asked them to write down their contact information in a notebook if they were interested.”

According to the article, two of the boys who had given Barer their information received a series of phone calls from the same phone number.

Barer’s bio on a sparsely used Twitter account describes him as someone “…who is passionate about sustainability and educating children.”

This story will be updated as the litigation process unfolds in Middlesex’s Superior Court.

 

Aaron Stagoff-Belfort can be reached at astagoffbelf@wesleyan.edu.

Camille De Beus can be reached at cdebeus@wesleyan.edu.

3 Comments

  1. Sad Alum

    After learning of the allegations, it seems like the prudent course of action for university leadership would have been to immediately compensate the plaintiffs for the horrors they suffered at Wesleyan and avert a potential PR disaster, with yet another former Wesleyan employee alleged to have committed sexual misconduct against Middletown-area minors.

    Instead, it appears to me that Wesleyan might actually considering defending the allegations, forcing the plaintiffs to relive their traumatic experiences. Did Wesleyan actually think that no one would stumble across this on the online court records and alert somebody?

    Very questionable decisions being made, but par for the course, I suppose.

  2. '18

    Lies, lies, lies:

    “The President’s Office declined to comment on the matter, in line with
    the University’s policy not to opine on pending litigation.”

    Interesting…
    – Wesleyan commented multiple times to media outlets, including the Argus, before and after the DKE verdict (Argus, 5/1/17, “DKE Lawsuit to Reach Trial After University’s Motion Fails”)
    – Roth himself gave a statement to CNN about the “Rape Factory” lawsuit (CNN, 5/16/14, “Wesleyan University student alleges rape, sues fraternity, members, other student”)
    – Wesleyan made a statement about Professor Curran’s retaliation lawsuit (Inside Higher Ed, 4/8/16, “When the Alleged Harasser Is the Dean”)

    But go ahead, President Roth. Keep lying about “University policy”. See where it takes you.

  3. DavidL

    How does a court reach the truth in a event that occurred nearly 35 years ago? This is why we have statutes of limitation.

Leave a Reply

Twitter