She is critical of my having appeared on a “Modern Languages [sic] Association panel united by a passion for boycotting Israel.” Professor Schwarcz proposes an end to our friendship–“a final splitting of the ways”–unless I find “the courage to dissent from the pack” of Marxists who endorse “lies about Israel,” the “one and only democracy in the Middle East.” The boycott movement is not about the political structure of Israel but about Palestine: about Israel’s taking of Palestinian land and water, its bulldozing of villages, its restriction of movement, its military reprisals and collective punishments, and so on through the endless list of oppressions, privations and indignities inflicted on people of the West Bank and Gaza during more than 45 years of occupation. I learned much from Vera, years ago, but do not regret my public unfriending by one who can omit all this from a comment on the BDS movement and a defense of Israeli civility. Three smaller points: 1. There are several democracies in the Middle East. 2. On the MLA panel, I argued against the academic boycott, though I support the economic boycott. 3. I credit Michael Roth with speaking out on many issues, but to praise him for the “courage” it took to write his Los Angeles Times op ed condemning the American Studies Association’s boycott resolution is (I think he would agree) a bit much. Around 150 college and university presidents and other high officials put out statements deploring the ASA vote. Many did so in response to pressure from alumni and donors, some of whom in turn were responding to a vigorous campaign by organizations close to the Israel lobby. (I have no reason to think Michael Roth was so motivated.) I’ve not heard of any college president who spoke in support of ASA or the BDS movement. Where is the “pack,” and where is the bold dissent, in this picture?
Ohmann is a Benjamin Waite Professor of English, Emeritus.