Wesleyan University has brought a lawsuit against former Vice President of Investments and Chief Investment Officer Thomas Kannam and nearly twenty other defendants, alleging breach of fiduciary duty, civil theft, breach of contract, fraud, statutory forgery, and unjust enrichment, among other charges. Kannam was dismissed from his position at the University on October 13. The University filed its suit in the Middletown Superior Court on November 24, requesting a hearing which could force Kannam to put aside a $3 million pre-judgment remedy that would be paid to the University if it eventually wins its case. There was no public announcement, and Wesleyan’s Director of Media Relations, David Pesci, declined to comment.

According to the University’s pleadings, Kannam violated his contract by devoting most of his energies into personal “entrepreneurial ventures,” which diverted his attention away from his duties at Wesleyan. The University also claims that Kannam improperly exploited his privileged access to Wesleyan’s financial information, some of which was proprietary, for his own benefit, and that he used the University’s funds for his own business and personal expenses.

“We deny all of the allegations in the complaint,” said Stephen J. Fitzgerald, Kannam’s attorney. “If there’s going to be a hearing on the pending application for a pre-judgment remedy, we will at that time put on our defense.”

According to the complaint, Kannam began improperly profiting from his position at Wesleyan in 2001, when he and Ralph Gill, an associate, formed Cross Border Capital Advisors, or CBCA. The University released what it claims are some of Kannam’s email correspondences, sent from both his official email address and a personal account he accessed regularly on his work computer, to support its charges.

“Through my portfolio at Wesleyan, I have a window on some very interesting stock ideas,” Kannam allegedly wrote. “If possible I’d like to cherry-pick the best and capitalize on them. Would it be possible to feed Mike’s [Zaninovich] hedge fund and get paid some incentive on the performance of our ideas? Might be the fastest way to some real dough.”

The University claims that around 2006, Kannam became the owner and Director of Investments for the Belstar Group, where he received his own healthcare plan, pension, and corporate credit card, and continued to take advantage of information about Wesleyan’s investments. Belstar’s Managing Partner and Chief Investment Officer reportedly described Kannam as “our critical endowment asset.” The suit also alleges that Kannam took business trips on behalf of Belstar at the University’s expense.

Kannam is also accused of sitting on several corporate boards, including that of his father’s company, Advanced Device Technology Inc., which supplies infrared devices to the United States military, and Vietnam Capital Partners. Wesleyan says that Kannam failed to alert the University President of his involvement in these other boards, which his contract required him to do.

“Another board seat ($=equity)…Whoo, whoo, whoo, whoooooo! They’re adding up,” Kannam wrote in an email to his wife, according to the University.

The University claims that Kannam was aware that his activities represented a conflict of interest, and that he took steps to conceal them. He allegedly created presentations for CBCA under his wife’s name, and, according to the University’s complaint, worked with a partner at Belstar to “draft a letter to the University’s President from an alleged Korean dignitary,” that would conceal his involvement in outside entrepreneurial projects.

“We need to handle this discreetly at Wesleyan since there’s major turnover on our Board now and the new members that are joining take their fiduciary duty seriously in the Sarbanes-Oxley environment,” Kannam allegedly wrote to a CBCA associate in 2005. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act set higher standards for oversight by corporate boards in the wake of the Enron scandal. The suit also argues that Kannam was concerned about the arrival of a new President in 2007, and told his associates that he would have to “lay low.”

When Kannam started working at Wesleyan, his office was located in North College, the main administrative building. The University claims that he lobbied to have the Investment Office moved into its current location at 74 Wyllys Avenue in order in order to conceal his private ventures from his colleagues. The complaint claims that Kannam referred to his office as “The Taj” and used it primarily for his non-Wesleyan business.

The suit alleges that Kannam used a variety of the University’s resources for the benefit of his private ventures. He reportedly offered to have his staff at the Wesleyan Investment Office handle projects for Belstar. In 2007 Kannam allegedly reported that a hedge fund had retained the services of Wesleyan’s Quantitative Analysis Center (QAC), an interdisciplinary data analysis workshop, and that it had agreed to pay a fee of several thousand dollars. This fund was allegedly Belstar, which never paid for the services it received from the QAC. The University claims that Kannam recommended the hiring of several new employees so that he could focus more of his attention on his own ventures. Of one new member of his staff, Kannam reportedly wrote, “I’m so happy. With my extracurricular ventures heating up, he’ll help a lot.”

Finally, the complaint accuses Kannam of fraudulently using University funds for his own expenses on “countless occasions.” The suit alleges that Kannam routinely doctored expense reports to pay for golfing outings, international travel, and even a trip to the 2008 Super Bowl. He allegedly allowed his associates to travel to conferences under the pretense that they were financial advisors to the University. He is also accused of having received “double reimbursement,” when he paid for his expenses using his Wesleyan credit card and then submitted his expenses for cash reimbursement.

The University claims that Kannam’s misconduct was discovered in 2009 and led to his termination, although two days after his departure President Michael Roth sent an all-campus email announcing that Kannam had left to “pursue other opportunities.” The trial has not yet begun, and it remains unclear how the University assembled its case. The Argus will have more updates as new information comes to light.

  • Wes Supporter. But…

    President Roth and the trustees nailed it. But…. where are the Argus reporters and updates? This story MUST stay front page. Am I alone on this?

  • Keep the pressure on

    ARGUS You are dragging your feet on Kannam

  • 1:31 here

    @6:28 am – I say that because my original comment about the Argus being protected from a libel suit by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act was “placed in a moderation queue” and never showed up. Odd.

  • Libel

    Strange that Wesleyan Argus doesn’t publish any kind of ‘legal information’ or ‘privacy policy’ on its website. Say for example that Kannam wanted to subpeona all the posts in this thread from server backups at Wesleyan to obtain the IP address of every inflammatory post against him. Since there is no privacy policy stated, he could theoretically do that. All that information is likely to be stored in server backups. Would be kind of funny if the very same Administrators who ransacked his computer were determined to be guilty of posting inflammatory and libelous comments!

  • Libel?

    I think both Mr. Kannam and Mr. Gill are the ones who have to worry about libelous statements. Case in point. Mr. Gill’s posting, if in fact it was Mr. Gill, is replete with what this casual observer would deem as libelous statements, not to mention disclosure of confidential HR information. Where did he get this confidential HR information?

  • Update

    What is going on with the Kannam case?

  • Ron Medley, `73

    @8PM: What are Wesleyan’s rights regarding the prejudgment remedy if Kannam drags his feet in obeying the court’s order? Some jurisdictions permit the plaintiff to attach the defendant’s assets as a form of security.

  • Rush to Prejudgment

    I would assume that you are right. He has to pledge hard assets. I would assume he would not have to liquidate them. I also suspect that he would have to overcollaterlized his pledge to account for any dimunition of asset value as a result of market fluctuations, unless he posts “hard cash”, which is doubtful. Perhaps a binding letter of credit that is 100% guaranteed by some entity would suffice.

    I would expect that a failure to post a prejudgment remedy would result in another court case. Not sure how it works. They would have to go to court and seek to have the judgment enforced. Would take time and be messy. It certainly would not look good in his fraud case. In fact, it might sink his case.

  • Ron Medley, `73

    Wouldn’t it involve a contempt of court citation as well?

  • Rush to Prejudgment

    You are right. It would. Isn’t that criminal? Seems folks are always getting thrown in the slammer for contempt of court. Maybe there are different types of contempt of court (but I think not).

  • Rush to Prejudgment

    Medley. I am still stuck on the fact that any money that was allegedly used frauduently is in fact endowment money. Why am I wrong? It seems that the $3 million must have come out of the endowment. Right?

  • Ron Medley, `73

    You have to assume by the time the university’s operating funds reach the level of payroll that it’s all just cash. But, I could be wrong. I suppose, the whole endowment angle, and the fact that the defendant held the title of CIO, is one reason Mr. Blumenthal is following the case.

  • Rush to Prejudgment

    If it is a separate entity, as it appears to be based on that SEC Belstar filing (one of the best finds on the comment section), I have to believe that annual tax forms and other non-profit filings, would state income and expenses, which would include salaries, etc.

  • Great News!

    Sounds like judge did order the 3million prejudgement and Kannam has not complied is that correct?

  • Burnt Toast

    The fact of the matter is that Wesleyan must have some pretty damning and compelling evidence against Kannam to ask for a prejudgment remedy. And they must have some amount of fear that the defendant would hide assets perhaps.

    And remember, this is a civil case. The standard for “guilt” is a lot lower than a criminal case. It ain’t “beyond a reasonable doubt”. It is the preponderous of evidence, and boy, have we seen evidence prepondering all over the place.

    I am afraid that Thomas “The Taj” Kannam is toast.

    Over and out, Tom.

  • The Gill’s Of Canada

    Does anyone know who Tony Gill is? He heads up a large Canadian Real Estate Firm called Gill Advisors, Inc.

    It appears that Ralph Gill has a position there currently (I guess he is wearing more than one hat, and he’s definitely Cross Border).

    http://gillinc.blogspot.com/advisors/advisors.html

    It also appears that Ralph Gill’s father works there as “Ajit Gill” also appears on a wedding announcement for Ralph Singh Gill and Anne Maureen Coyle, as well as on Tony Gill’s website.

    Seems like the Gill business is “all in the family”.

    Another interesting fact is that Ralph Gill has been lifted from Tony Gill’s main website which is gillinc.com. I guess he missed lifting Ralph Gill from his blogspot.

    There definitely is some sort of big time Indian connection here.

  • Comment Due Diligence

    I just hope the Wes lawyers have read these comments. There appear to be some good investigative leads herein.

    I was stunned to see Wes’ name actually listed as an affiliate on the Belstar financial advisor SEC form.

    If I were another investment house working with the Wes Endowment staff, I would wonder what the heck was going on with Wes and Belstar.

    I would also wonder if any analysis which I provided to Wes was then shipped to a firm with which Wes was an affiliate. Afterall, the SEc Filing says that Wes is an affiliate, and an affiliate does in fact share research.

    I think there is a whole other level of potential fraud here. And that is sharing of confidential research reports and/or “Deal flow” with people other than the intended recipients.

    Is it possible that any of this information was considered insider information and unlawfully shared?

  • Kudos

    Kannam earns coveted spot in the New York Times’ “Inside the Times”

    New York

    EX-FINANCIAL ADVISER IS SUED BY WESLEYAN

    Wesleyan University has filed a lawsuit accusing Thomas Kannam, whom it hired in 1998 to oversee its endowment, of violating his contract by spending most of his time on outside business ventures.

  • NDA Man

    Wesleyan lawyers should do the following-

    1. Obtain signed copies of all non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) signed by Kannam or his designees during his tenure at Wesleyan. These are typically required when one party provides proprietary or confidential information to another, disclosure of which would harm the providing party.

    2. Investigate whether this confidential information was provided to a third party(ies) in violation of the NDA, or used in a manner that violated the terms of the NDA

    Examples of proprietary or confidential information include prospective “deals” (deal flow), non-public information, confidential research or analysis, or information that, if disclosed, could harm the party who relied on the receiving party’s commitment to nondisclosure.

  • Watching and Waiting

    Good catch NDA Man. I sure hope they are reviewing these NDAs. But, I bet they already have and have a ton a breaches they have discovered. And I bet that makes up a large part of the case. Whoooo Whooooo Oucheroo

  • Bin Laden Found

    Why not sue the kids involed too??

    I understand that while the man was on business attending some financial conferences he bought his kids along and they went to Disneyland.

  • ReTort

    Can’t sue children. Can only sue parents or guardians.

    I also do not recall that the Disney Trip was associated with any financial conference, although this might be one of those meetings where Ratan Tata was the host. Probably at “Its a Small World”, or maybe at the Indian In/Out Burgers at EPCOT

  • Anonymous

    Was the Disney trip a misuse of company credit card or was a fraudulent expense report filed

  • ReTort

    Anonymous: You question is a good one. The way I undertand it there were fraudulent expenses claimed. It is unclear whether it was via a credit card or a reimburseable expense report.

  • Anonymous

    Corportate credit cards have the employee liability built in. No lawsuit necessary to recover funds for this action, perhaps justified in termination.

    http://www.universitycio.harvard.edu/admin/policies/financial/corporate_card.php

  • Anon

    Wasn’t Kannam, representing Wes, speaking at that financial conference held at Disney? Also on Wes business, he had been sent to the Super Bowl and that golf outing to talk up investments by alumni.

  • ReTort

    Kannam’s duty was to manage the endowment, not raise funds. He wasn’t even an Alum, so raising funds would be out of the question.

    The SEC form for Belstar, however, indicated that Kannam’s duty was to apparently raise funds.

    If you meet someone with deep pockets, do you pitch Wes or Belstar? Talk about a conflict.

    No one sends anyone to the Super Bowl to raise funds.

    Financial conferences are never held at Disney. These are Four Seasons, Ritz Carlton or Peninsula events.

  • Anon

    BTW, before anyone accuses me of being Kannam or Gill, I am neither. I am, however, former faculty who merely wants the record to be set straight. This Argus blog of Kannam-bashing — by many supposedly different contributors who have surprisingly the same writing style and syntax — presents but one side of the picture. By all means, keep us up to date on the legal proceedings, especially since Kannam has said nothing to date. But sticking to the facts will give your musings far more credence than snide and libelous jokes about sodomy and condoms.

  • Grammarian

    Anon,

    BTW,what record did you set straight? You merely admonished those who wrote trash. So you really are not setting the record straight, you are only scolding the bad apples.

    anyone wiht half a brain who reads these comments can sort through the junk versus the facts versus the allegations.

    I only trust the information that is sourced with a url.

  • neurolinguistic writing patterns

    -blunt one or two sentence declarations with few words more than 2 syllables.

    -Difficulty in employing expressive vocabulary that ever venture beyond the ” low lying fruit” of the English language

    -tongue in cheek easily digestible soundbites
    ‘Talk about a conflict’

    -when ‘?” gets angry, the rules of grammar, punctuation and spelling tend to fly out the window as ze goes into “stream of conscious mode”

    ‘Retort’, ‘Grammarian’,’NDA Man’ and ‘What?’ to name a few are the same individual.’

  • anon

    Haven’t you all figured out yet that when it comes to MB’s writing, content is just a vehicle for style? Contrarianism makes for far more interesting prose – that’s all there is to it.

    Put aside content – he never bothers coming to a point, anyway – and you’ll find his letters quite enjoyable.

    “Nor was the school’s First Lady of Pornography taking it lying down. ” – brilliant!

    “Whoever it is, let’s give the diffident devil his due and say that, as lipstick labels go, the porny old porker’s would sell like hotcakes, if not for the far-from-furtive, unkosher smell.” – catch the alliteration?

    “gauzy layers of Jargonese” have already been mentioned, but dayum!

  • anon

    it appears that someone failed to earn tenure

  • updatge

    alot of people are checking this blog for updates. is the 22nd of february the next big event?

  • Anon

    I did receive tenure, albeit, not at Wesleyan. Moving on to greener pastures, and certainly an institution with a better ‘fit’ for me, I finally found my calling. Best wishes to all the students at Wesleyan.

  • Anonymous

    Another current lawsuit involves someone who did not receive tenure and is currently suing Wesleyan University

    http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/PartySearch.aspx

  • Ariana

    KANNAM MAKES HUFFINGTON POST TODAY

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com

    Search on keyword “kannam”.

    I am now thinking that some of the commenters on this page are writers from various web periodicals. This might explain the “sound bite” writing style that “anon” observed.

  • eldrick

    hey kannam, why don’t you do a press conference like tiger woods? get it all off of your chest.

  • Anonymous

    I hope Kannam does a press conference when he is ACQUITTED of all charges. Looks like Administration has made a strong case for terminating him, possibly. Since no criminal or misappropriation alleged, why drag all this into the court system. Expense reports are a fuzzy area and the fact that Administration APPROVED all these charges when it had every option to not approve them does not make their case look too good. There are remedies for misuse of credit cards that are built in without having to involve the legal system. The fact he had outside work is possible grounds for termination. Thats it.

  • anon

    1:10 all good points but i would disagree with your points on expense reports. you can submit fraudulent reports that appear valid and get approval. madoff did the same thing with his monthly financial statements to investors. certainly they could have just fired kannam and not filed a suit. the fact that the suit lists an incredible number of defendants says to me that there is way more here than meets the eye.

  • Sweating it out

    Monday is a big day in this case. Conference at the courthouse! 2pm sharp!

  • Anonymous

    anon- how could anyone have made a bunch of money from whatever time period until September of 09?? Even if arrangments were made – most people were losing $$ during this time period. i dont think you can company american express cards misuse with bernard madoff!

  • Anonymous

    its like comparing a traffic ticket to a major collision.

  • Anon

    a slap on the wrist would not suffice once the e-mail came to light.

  • anon

    kannan needs to face the music. ironically, he composed the music via those e-mails

  • Anonymous

    Does Wesleyan regularly monitor all its employee’s computer and email activity?

  • anon

    1:06 Probably not. The task would be too massive and expensive. You would need an army of monitors. Most people are honest.

  • student

    Some of the comments on this page disgust me. Kannam has not been proven guilty of anything, and the Wesleyan newspaper obviously only puts forth one side of the story. I cannot fathom why some of you are willing to stoop so low as to make racist comments and suggest sodomy. You do not know this man. You do not know the full story. The comments you make are an embarrassment to you and to your school.

  • anon

    1:21 What is the full story? I am not sure I have seen any racist remarks. What race? Asian? What remarks were made against Asians?

  • to 1:21

    so we’re supposed to presume this man is innocent when our college sues him for millions of dollars? yeah, okay. sounds perfectly reasonable to the average elite liberal arts college student.

  • Anonymous

    1:21 you’re only hearing the Administration spin machine side of the story. If you read, the NYT article, their case sounds like a crock

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/06/nyregion/06wesleyan.html

    Personally, I am suspicious of the way the personal information in Kannams email and computer was obtained and violation of employees rights.

    Yes employees do have some rights in this area

    http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dltr/articles/2001dltr0026.html

    The ‘whistleblower’ explanation just sounds too convenient for the university. A whistleblower is “protected” so there is no way to verify the veracity of that claim or if the Administration was going through Kannam’s email for some time in veangeful attempt to dig up dirt (which he obviously succeeded) in order to look up whatever statements he made in email vis a vis “360 reviews”

Twitter